 | 
|
| NY LECTURES ONLINE |
Click here - to see past NY Lectures; then type in neuropsychoanalysis |
| Calendar |
September, 2010
| S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
| 29 |
30 |
31 |
01 |
02 |
03 |
04 |
| 05 |
06 |
07 |
08 |
09 |
10 |
11 |
| 12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
| 19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| 26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
01 |
02 |
|
|  |
| View Topic |
Forums
:: Discussion Forum
:: Philosophy of mind
|
 Reply |
| Philosophy of mind |
Posted by laurascott on 07/04/2006 07:46
I am currently writing an honours thesis on the philosophy of mind in neuro-psychoanalysis. My current perspective is that there are two dominant philosophies of mind in the movement. These include:
1. A dual-apsect theory (Spinoza) where the mind and body are two aspects of the one substance.
2. An emergentist approach (Sperry) where the mind emerges from the complexity of brain processes.
Can anybody offer any guidance as to whether this is representative of the views held amongst neuro-psychoanalytic researchers?
|
|
Reply |
|
|
|
RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS IN NPSA |
|
DOWNLOADS (LECTURES, ETC) |
|
REGIONAL AND SPECIALIST
GROUPS |
|
|
|
| ©2010 NPSA 13 Prowse Place
London NW1 9PN, UK. T: +44(0)20 7482 6999 F:+44 (0)20 7284 4030
developed by: pumpkin pie net |
Report